Saturday, March 7UKJAS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR INSPECTION BODIES

 

Download PDF

UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd.

terms and conditions

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR INSPECTION BODIES

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT

Certification Administration FOR Confirming BODIES LLC (hereinafter
called UKJAS), require their investigation bodies to agree with the
UKJAS contract, Notice of Grasping, working techniques and their own
the board framework as per ISO 17020. Examination bodies will supply
such sensible proof of consistence as is considered significant by
UKJAS. from time to time. Inability to submit palatable proof might
prompt license administration visits which will be charged at the
current rate. Except if characterized somewhere else in correspondence
among UKJAS and the examination body the ongoing rate is THREE
US dollar and 77 pennies every moment and a standard day is 185 and
20 minutes. An investigation body is the term given to, or the meaning
of, an association or individual endeavor investigation body
administrations.

Testaments And Logos

An examination body might apply the UKJAS logo to endorsements just
in regard of their gear, items and cycles surveyed and certificated, and
to bring to the consideration of clients, when sensible and proper, any
areas of business for which it has not been enrolled or surveyed.
Utilization of the UKJAS logo is permitted just following installment to
UKJAS. by the enlisted examination body. Enrolled review bodies are
responsible for the enlistment expense due in regard of theirgross
turnover barring esteem added charges. Utilization of some other logo
in regard of UKJAS. for example ‘Crown and Tick’ isn’t approved and Is
outside the extent of UKJAS. locale. Copyright and any remaining
licensed innovation freedoms getting from our endlessly work performed
and conveyed and guaranteed by the enrolled review body as falling
inside the locale of UKJAS enlistment remains with UKJAS except if
generally concurred with us recorded as a hard copy.

Notice

Any notification under these Agreements or prerequisite ofthe quality
administration framework of UKJAS. or on the other hand the
agreements between UKJAS. also, its enrolled investigation bodies will
be recorded as a hard copy and endorsed by or for sake ofthe party
giving it and might be served by leaving it or sending it by paid ahead of
time recorded conveyance or enlisted post. Any notification served by
present will be considered on have been served 70 hours from the hour
of posting or on the other hand if beyond the UK, NINE days from the
date of posting. In demonstrating such administration it will be adequate
to demonstrate that the notification was appropriately tended to and was
posted.

End Of The Declaration And Enrollment

UKJAS will pull out the authentication which is consistently the property
of UKJAS, and the utilization of its logo from any assessment body who
doesn’t consent to these Terms and Conditions.

The assessment body upon warning ofthe end of enlistment will quickly
end utilization of the UKJAS logo and all publicizing matter which
contains them or any reference thereto. Likewise, some other archives
in the ownership of the assessment body which bear reference to
UKJAS. will if UKJAS. so want it, be so treated as to delete it.

Contract among registrant and UKJAS will be considered ended when
monies because of UKJAS stay remarkable in abundance of60 days
from date of receipt.

End may of this agreement is at the desire of one or the other party by
giving 60 days’ notification recorded as a hard copy without reason or
from this point forward upon break or expectant break of agreement.

License Administrations

Authorization administrations arerelevant just to declarations gave by
the assessment body for guidelines that are characterized in agreement
or Notice old Understanding between the assessment body and UKJAS
and except if expressed running against the norm UKJAS testaments
mean that according to UKJAS and its workers the examination body
who is the subject of the enrollment authentication given by UKJAS_has
exhibited an affirmation of the advantages furthermore, attractiveness of
being authorize concerning the extent of exercises and norms indicated
on the license authentication and agreement or Notice of
Understanding. In giving the authentication UKJAS is affirming
enrollment of the review body in the UKJAS rundown of bodies. Review
bodies are prompted that full consistence with any standard referred to
in the extent of authentications isn’t certificated as certain factors like
the example nature of assessments and the consistence by the
examination body with their own strategies on occasion when UKJAS
are absent and different issues is past the control of UKJAS. The fact
that the assessment concerning any makes assessment bodies
educated other association or individual concerning consistence with
any standard that might be cited in the extent of endorsements or the
surmising of the term “license” might be different to that of UKJAS and
its workers however in any case consistence isn’t the subject ofthe
endorsement.

Further Counsel, Authority And Certification

Investigation bodies and clients are encouraged to take master counsel
while drawing in certification administrations. The authority vested in
UKJAS is that relegated to there by the assessment body in regard of
the certification administrations contracted and no case as to legal,
official, authority, noticeable quality or right given by any other party
except if indicated by UKJAS is asserted. Investigation bodies are told
to abstain from saying, suggesting or causing to be gathered that, under
the protection of UKJAS enlistment they act with the help, endorsement
or then again permit of the UK government or some other legal or
government office of any country, commission or then again state.

Regulation

These circumstances and the exercises of UKJAS are subject to the
laws of LONDON, UK. UKJAS will not be obligated reflectively for
results, costs or harms emerging from changes or presentation of such
regulations or legal government instruments which may hence refute
UKJAS exercises.

Installments

UKJAS require their enrolled review bodies to pay expenses ahead of
time or by an endorsed elective strategy characterized recorded as a
hard copy, to keep up with their enrollment and the legitimacy of review
testaments.

terms and conditions for inspection bodies compressed page 0001

 

UK Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel.: +448369083940
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

MUMBAI Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel.: +7499991895
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR , Haryana
Tel.: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.ukjas.com

Branches

terms and conditions for inspection bodies compressed page 0002

 

Download PDF

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b Crerar, Lorne D. (September 2007). “The Crerar Review: The report of the independent review of regulation, audit, inspection and complaints handling of public services in Scotland”. www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2021-01-16.
  2. ^ Ahi, Kiarash (2015-05-13). Anwar, Mehdi F; Crowe, Thomas W; Manzur, Tariq (eds.). “Terahertz characterization of electronic components and comparison of terahertz imaging with X-ray imaging techniques”. SPIE Sensing Technology+ Applications. Terahertz Physics, Devices, and Systems IX: Advanced Applications in Industry and Defense. 9483: 94830K-94830K-15. Bibcode:2015SPIE.9483E..0KA. doi:10.1117/12.2183128. S2CID 118178651.
  3. ^ “Quality Glossary”. American Society for Quality (ASQ). Retrieved 2015-02-20.
  4. ^ AS9100 Revision C, Clause 7.6 Control of Monitoring and Measurement Equipment
  5. ^ Ltd, Digital Parent Company. “3D Scanning Services | Physical Digital”. www.physicaldigital.com. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
  6. ^ “Labour inspection”. libguides.ilo.org. International Labour Organization. Retrieved 2021-01-16.
  7. ^ “Liaison offices and labour inspectorate”. employment.belgium.be. Federal Public Service Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue, Belgium. Retrieved 2021-01-16.
  8. ^ “Labour inspection”. www.iloencyclopaedia.org. International Labour Organization. Retrieved 2021-01-16.
  9. ^ Antaki, George (2005). Fitness-for-Service Evaluations for Piping and Pressure Vessels: ASME Code Simplified. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0071453998.
  10. ^ BS EN ISO/IEC 17020: “Conformity assessment – Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection”, pp. 1 (2012)
  11. ^ Ben-Gal I., Herer Y. and Raz T. (2003). “Self-correcting inspection procedure under inspection errors” (PDF). IIE Transactions on Quality and Reliability, 34(6), pp. 529-540. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-13. Retrieved 2014-01-10. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12.  “APM and MoM – Symbiotic Solution Sets”. APM Digest. 11 May 2012.
  13.  Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon: logos, 1889.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b Entry λόγος at LSJ online.
  15. ^ J. L. Heiberg, Euclid, Elements,
  16. ^ Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed): Heraclitus, (1999).
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Paul Anthony Rahe, Republics Ancient and Modern: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece, University of North Carolina Press (1994), ISBN 080784473X, p. 21.
  18. ^ Rapp, Christof, “Aristotle’s Rhetoric“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
  19. ^ David L. Jeffrey (1992). A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. p. 459. ISBN 978-0802836342.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed): Philo Judaeus, (1999).
  21. ^ Adam Kamesar (2004). “The Logos Endiathetos and the Logos Prophorikos in Allegorical Interpretation: Philo and the D-Scholia to the Iliad“ (PDF). Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (GRBS). 44: 163–181. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-07.
  22. ^ May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977.
  23. ^ David L. Jeffrey (1992). A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. p. 460. ISBN 978-0802836342.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon: lexis, 1889.
  25. ^ Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon: legō, 1889.
  26. ^ Launderville, Dale (2003). “Poetic Truth and the Manifestation of the Divine Source of Royal Authority”. Piety and Politics: The Dynamics of Royal Authority in Homeric Greece, Biblical Israel, and Old Babylonian Mesopotamia. Bible in Its World. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 32. ISBN 9780802845054. Retrieved 7 October 2023. [… I]n Archaic Greece […] logos was a form of discourse focused on persuading an assembly, whereas mythos was discourse linked with the authority of a wisdom figure. […] Emerging Greek philosophical discourse defined its own sphere of authority as reasoned argument over against the imaginative tales of poets and bards: logos was pitted against mythos […].
  27. ^ F. E. Peters, Greek Philosophical Terms, New York University Press, 1967.
  28. ^ W. K. C. Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1962, pp. 419ff.
  29. ^ The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  30. ^ Translations from Richard D. McKirahan, Philosophy before Socrates, Hackett, (1994).
  31. ^ Handboek geschiedenis van de wijsbegeerte 1, Article by Jaap Mansveld & Keimpe Algra, p. 41
  32. ^ W. K. C. Guthrie, The Greek Philosophers: From Thales to Aristotle, Methuen, 1967, p. 45.
  33. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aristotle, Rhetoric, in Patricia P. Matsen, Philip B. Rollinson, and Marion Sousa, Readings from Classical Rhetoric, SIU Press (1990), ISBN 0809315920, p. 120.
  34. ^ In the translation by W. Rhys Roberts, this reads “the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself”.
  35. ^ Eugene Garver, Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An art of character, University of Chicago Press (1994), ISBN 0226284247, p. 114.
  36. ^ Robert Wardy, “Mighty Is the Truth and It Shall Prevail?”, in Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Amélie Rorty (ed), University of California Press (1996), ISBN 0520202287, p. 64.
  37. ^ Translated by W. Rhys Roberts, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.mb.txt (Part 2, paragraph 3)
  38. ^ Tripolitis, A., Religions of the Hellenistic-Roman Age, pp. 37–38. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  39. ^ Studies in European Philosophy, by James Lindsay (2006 [1909]), ISBN 1406701734, p. 53
  40. ^ Marcus Aurelius (1964). Meditations. London: Penguin Books. p. 24. ISBN 978-0140441406.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c David M. Timmerman and Edward Schiappa, Classical Greek Rhetorical Theory and the Disciplining of Discourse (London: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010): 43–66
  42. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy, Volume 1, Continuum, (2003), pp. 458–462.
  43. ^ Philo, De Profugis, cited in Gerald Friedlander, Hellenism and Christianity, P. Vallentine, 1912, pp. 114–115.
  44. ^ Kohler, Kauffman (1901–1906). “Memra (= “Ma’amar” or “Dibbur,” “Logos”)”. In Singer, Isidore; Funk, Isaac K.; Vizetelly, Frank H. (eds.). Jewish Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. pp. 464–465.
  45. ^ John 1:1
  46. ^ John 1:1
  47. ^ John 1:1
  48. ^ Alexander Böhlig; Frederik Wisse (1975). Nag Hammadi Codices III, 2 and IV, 2 – The Gospel of the Egyptians (the Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit) – Volumes 2-3. Brill. Retrieved 2022-09-23.
  49. ^ Michael F. Wagner, Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus’ Enneads, Volume 8 of Studies in Neoplatonism, SUNY Press (2002), ISBN 0791452719, pp. 116–117.
  50. ^ John M. Rist, Plotinus: The road to reality, Cambridge University Press (1967), ISBN 0521060850, pp. 84–101.
  51. ^ “Between Physics and Nous: Logos as Principle of Meditation in Plotinus”, The Journal of Neoplatonic Studies, Volumes 7–8, (1999), p. 3
  52. ^ Handboek Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte I, Article by Carlos Steel
  53. ^ The Journal of Neoplatonic Studies, Volumes 7–8, Institute of Global Cultural Studies, Binghamton University (1999), p. 16
  54. ^ Ancient philosophy by Anthony Kenny (2007). ISBN 0198752725 p. 311
  55. ^ The Enneads by Plotinus, Stephen MacKenna, John M. Dillon (1991) ISBN 014044520X p. xcii [1]
  56. ^ Neoplatonism in Relation to Christianity by Charles Elsee (2009) ISBN 1116926296 pp. 89–90 [2]
  57. ^ The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology edited by Alan Richardson, John Bowden (1983) ISBN 0664227481 p. 448 [3]
  58. ^ Jung and aesthetic experience by Donald H. Mayo, (1995) ISBN 0820427241 p. 69
  59. ^ Theological treatises on the Trinity, by Marius Victorinus, Mary T. Clark, p. 25
  60. ^ Neoplatonism and Christian thought (Volume 2), By Dominic J. O’Meara, p. 39
  61. ^ Hans Urs von Balthasar, Christian meditation Ignatius Press ISBN 0898702356 p. 8
  62. ^ Confessions, Augustine, p. 130
  63. ^ Handboek Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte I, Article by Douwe Runia
  64. ^ De immortalitate animae of Augustine: text, translation and commentary, By Saint Augustine (Bishop of Hippo.), C. W. Wolfskeel, introduction
  65. ^ Gardet, L., “Kalām”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs.
  66. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Boer, Tj. de and Rahman, F., “ʿAḳl”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs.
  67. ^ Sufism: love & wisdom by Jean-Louis Michon, Roger Gaetani (2006) ISBN 0941532755 p. 242 [4]
  68. ^ Sufi essays by Seyyed Hossein Nasr 1973 ISBN 0873952332 p. 148]
  69. ^ Biographical encyclopaedia of Sufis by N. Hanif (2002). ISBN 8176252662 p. 39 [5]
  70. ^ Charles A. Frazee, “Ibn al-‘Arabī and Spanish Mysticism of the Sixteenth Century”, Numen 14 (3), Nov 1967, pp. 229–240.
  71. ^ Dobie, Robert J. (2009). Logos and Revelation: Ibn ‘Arabi, Meister Eckhart, and Mystical Hermeneutics. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 225. ISBN 978-0813216775. For Ibn Arabi, the Logos or “Universal Man” was a mediating link between individual human beings and the divine essence.
  72. ^ Edward Henry Whinfield, Masnavi I Ma’navi: The spiritual couplets of Maulána Jalálu-‘d-Dín Muhammad Rúmí, Routledge (2001) [1898], ISBN 0415245311, p. xxv.
  73. ^ Biographical encyclopaedia of Sufis N. Hanif (2002). ISBN 8176252662 p. 98 [6]
  74. ^ Betül Avcı, “Character of Sühan in Şeyh Gâlib’s Romance, Hüsn ü Aşk (Beauty and Love)” Archivum Ottomanicum, 32 (2015).
  75. ^ C.G. Jung and the psychology of symbolic forms by Petteri Pietikäinen (2001) ISBN 9514108574 p. 22
  76. ^ Mythos and logos in the thought of Carl Jung by Walter A. Shelburne (1988) ISBN 0887066933 p. 4 [7]
  77. ^ Carl Jung, Aspects of the Feminine, Princeton University Press (1982), p. 65, ISBN 0710095228.
  78. ^ Fahnestock, Jeanne. “The Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos”.
  79. ^ General linguistics by Francis P. Dinneen (1995). ISBN 0878402780 p. 118 [8]
  80. ^ The history of linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600 by Vivien Law (2003) ISBN 0521565324 p. 29 [9]
  81. ^ Theological dictionary of the New Testament, Volume 1 by Gerhard Kittel, Gerhard Friedrich, Geoffrey William Bromiley (1985). ISBN 0802824048 p. 508 [10]
  82. ^ The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Q–Z by Geoffrey W. Bromiley (1995). ISBN 0802837840 p. 1102 [11]
  83. ^ Old Testament Theology by Horst Dietrich Preuss, Leo G. Perdue (1996). ISBN 0664218431 p. 81 [12]
  84. ^ What Every Christian Ought to Know. Adrian Rogers (2005). ISBN 0805426922 p. 162 [13]
  85. ^ The Identified Life of Christ. Joe Norvell (2006) ISBN 1597812943 p. [14]
  86. ^ Boggs, Brenda (2008). Holy Spirit, Teach Me. Xulon Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-1604774252.
  87. ^ Law, Terry (2006). The Fight of Every Believer: Conquering the Thought Attacks That War Against Your Mind. Harrison House. p. 45. ISBN 978-1577945802.
  88. ^ James T. Draper and Kenneth Keathley, Biblical Authority, Broadman & Holman (2001), ISBN 0805424539, p. 113.
  89. ^ John F. MacArthur, Charismatic Chaos, Zondervan (1993), ISBN 0310575729, pp. 45–46.
  90.  Bealey, Frank (1999). The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science: A User’s Guide to Its Terms. Wiley. pp. 22–23. ISBN 0-631-20694-9.
  91. ^ Miller, David (26 June 2003). “Political authority”. Political Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 20. ISBN 9780191577864. Retrieved 28 September 2024. Political authority has two sides to it. On the one side, people generally recognize it as authority, in other words as having the right to command […] On the other side, people who refuse to obey are compelled to do so by the threat of sanctions […]. And these two aspects are complementary.
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought Third Edition, Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, Eds. p. 115.
  93. ^ Covell, Charles (9 July 2009). “Rousseau, Kant and Hegel”. The Law of Nations in Political Thought: A Critical Survey from Vitoria to Hegel. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230244450. Retrieved 28 September 2024. [According to Kant, the] juridicial order of civil society found its concrete institutional embodiment in the civil state, as through the legislative, executive and judicial authorities that comprised the basis of the state constitution and the system of state government. Of the three state authorities, the legislative authority was understood by Kant to be foundational in that it stood as the sovereign authority in the state […].
  94. ^ The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought, Third edition, Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, eds., pp. 677–678.
  95. ^ Widyono, Benny (Oct 2014). “United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC)”.
  96. ^ Krause, George A. (2010). Durant, Robert F. (ed.). “Legislative Delegation of Authority to Bureaucratic Agencies”. The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 524.
  97. ^ Glanville, Luke (2016). Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.). “Sovereignty”. The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 153.
  98. ^ Laitin, David (1998). “Toward a Political Science Discipline: Authority Patterns Revisited”. Comparative Political Studies. 31 (4): 423–443. doi:10.1177/0010414098031004002. S2CID 146736449.
  99. ^ Cristi, Renato (2005). Hegel on Freedom and Authority. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales Press.
  100. ^ Anthony Giddens, Sociology. London: Polity Press, 1997:581
  101. ^ Max Weber in “Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations for the 21st Century”, translated and edited by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters. pp. 137-138.
  102. ^ C. Naomi Osorio-Kupferblum: “Conceptualising ‘Authority’”. In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies. Vol. 23, No. 2, 13 March 2015, pp. 223–236, doi:10.1080/09672559.2015.1020828
  103. ^ Bloom, Howard (2010). The Genius of the Beast: a radical re-vision of capitalism. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 186. ISBN 978-1-59102-754-6. To validate an argument, we refer back to our ancestors – or to someone who, while still alive, has already garnered the sort of authority only ancestors normally have.
  104. ^ Max Weber in Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society, translated and edited by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters, Palgrave Books 2015, pp. 136 [ISBN missing]
  105. ^ TY  – CHAP AU  – Guzman, Sebastian PY  – 2007/02/01 SP  – 1 EP  – 2 N2  – Rational legal authority is a concept developed by Max Weber (1864–1920) to explain the stability of domination in modern times, especially in bureaucracies and democracies. A ruler is or has rational legal authority when she is perceived as legitimate by her subjects on the grounds that she has been given rights to issue commands by formal rules or laws. This entry defines the concept in relation to Weber’s more general understanding of domination and other types of legitimate domination, explains the usefulness of the concept from a Weberian perspective, and presents some of the main criticisms of the concept. T1  – Rational Legal Authority DO  – 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosr026.pub2 ER  –
  106. ^ Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., & Beller, J. (2011). Towards a Dynamic Balance between Humans and Automation: Authority, Ability, Responsibility and Control in Cooperative Control Situations. Cognition, Technology and Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0191-6
  107. ^ Ludeke, Steven; Johnson, Wendy; Bouchard, Thomas J. (2013-08-01). “”Obedience to traditional authority:” A heritable factor underlying authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness”. Personality and Individual Differences. 55 (4): 375–380. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.018. ISSN 0191-8869.
  108. ^ Laupa, 1991.
  109. ^ Reinhard. Bendix. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc. 1960.
  110. ^ “Country Comparison”. Hofstede Insights. 21 Jun 2021. Retrieved 3 Nov 2021.
  111. ^ “The Declaration of Independence”. Archived from the original on 2009-08-02. Retrieved 2009-07-27.[full citation needed]
  112. ^ Jump up to:a b c Guelzo, Allen C. (2012). Lincoln Speeches. New York: Penguin Books.
  113. ^ Jump up to:a b Ferejohn, John (2004). “The Authority of Regulation and the Control of Regulators”. In Marie-Anne Frison-Roche (ed.). Droit et économie de la régulation. Cairn.info. pp. 35–37. ISBN 9782724686463. OCLC 7292576035. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020 – via archive.today/IA9DF archive.is.
  114.  “Certification”. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Feb 27, 2024.
  115. ^ “Glossary of Important Assessment and Measurement Terms”. NCME. Archived from the original on 2017-07-22. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  116. ^ Cem Kaner (Mar 26, 2014). “Why propose an advanced certification in software testing?”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  117. ^ “Academic Degrees Abbreviations”. Abbreviations.com. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  118. ^ “Motion Picture Association of America”. mpaa.org. Archived from the original on Dec 30, 2011.
  119. ^ International standards and private standards. International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISBN 978-92-67-10518-5. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023 – via DocPlayer.
  120. ^ “Attestations of conformity”. CASCO. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Nov 30, 2023.
  121. ^ “U.S. Conformity Assessment System: 3rd Party Conformity Assessment”. ANSI Standards Portal. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  122. ^ Jump up to:a b “Certifying Software Testers Worldwide – ISTQB® International Software Testing Qualifications Board”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  123. ^ “International Institute for Software Testing (IIST) CSTP & CTM Informational Home Page”. Testinginstitute.com. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  124.  Marcos Antonio Mendoza, “Reinsurance as Governance: Governmental Risk Management Pools as a Case Study in the Governance Role Played by Reinsurance Institutions”, 21 Conn. Ins. L.J. 53, (2014) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2573253
  125. ^ Levi-Faur, David, Regulation and Regulatory Governance, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation and Governance, No. 1, 2010
  126. ^ Orbach, Barak, What Is Regulation? 30 Yale Journal on Regulation Online 1 (2012)
  127. ^ Sim, Michael (2018). “Limited Liability and the Known Unknown”. Duke Law Journal. 68: 275–332. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3121519. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 44186028 – via SSRN.
  128. ^ Schwarcz, Steven L. (2011). “Keynote & Chapman Dialogue Address: Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Approaches to Financial Regulation”. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1748007. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 154354509.
  129. ^ Hosoe, Moriki (2020), “Ex-ante Regulation, Ex-post Regulation, and Collusion”, Applied Economic Analysis of Information and Risk, Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 49–66, doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3300-6_4, ISBN 978-981-15-3299-3, S2CID 216306756, retrieved 2020-11-03
  130. ^ Shavell, Steven (October 1983). “Liability for Harm Versus Regulation of Safety”. Cambridge, MA. doi:10.3386/w1218.
  131. ^ Eraldo Banovac. Monitoringgrundlagen der kroatischen Regulierungsbehörde für Energie. EW − das Magazin für die Energie Wirtschaft, Vol. 103, No. 1–2, 2004, pp. 14–16.
  132. ^ Anders Kjellberg (2017) “Self-regulation versus State Regulation in Swedish Industrial Relations” In Mia Rönnmar and Jenny Julén Votinius (eds.) Festskrift till Ann Numhauser-Henning. Lund: Juristförlaget i Lund 2017, pp. 357-383
  133. ^ Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance
  134. ^ Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008), Introductory Handbook for Undertaking Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/44789472.pdf, retrieved 4/11/23.
  135. ^ Sigman, Rachel, and Staffan I. Lindberg. “Neopatrimonialism and democracy: An empirical investigation of Africa’s political regimes.” V-Dem Working Paper 56 (2017).
  136. ^ “QuantGov”. quantgov.org. Retrieved June 4, 2023.
  137. ^ John Braithwaite, Péter Drahos. (2000). Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press.
  138. ^ Levi-Faur, David, “The Odyssey of the Regulatory State – Episode One: The Rescue of the Welfare State”, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, Paper No. 39, November 2011.
  139. ^ Giandomenico Majone (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17, pp 139-167 doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003524
  140. ^ Dal Bó, Ernesto (2006). “Regulatory capture: A review”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 22 (2): 203–225. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj013. JSTOR 23606888.
  141. ^ “Regulatory Capture Definition”. Investopedia. Archived from the original on October 3, 2015. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
Translate »