Sunday, May 4UKJAS

UKJAS STRATEGY ON APPROVED SIGNATORIES

UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd.

sign

UKJAS STRATEGY ON APPROVED SIGNATORIES

Changed December 2016

This strategy frames the UKJAS strategy in regards to research facility and review
office staff approved to sign test reports, adjustment authentications and additionally
assessment reports.

Reference:
ISO/IEC 17020:Latest, Congruity appraisal — Prerequisites for the Activity of Different
Sorts of Bodies Performing Assessment.
ISO/IEC 17011 : Latest, Congruity appraisal — General prerequisites for authorization
bodies certifying similarity evaluation bodies.
ISO/IEC Standard 17025 : Latest, General prerequisites for the capability of testing and
alignment research facilities.

Necessities:

Certify research centers and review offices are answerable for guaranteeing that
their faculty, whether full-time, parttime or under agreement, are directed and
capable, and that they work as per the lab’s or examination organization’s
administration framework. Also, ISO/IEC Standard 17025 and ISO/IEC Standard
17020 expect the board to approve explicit faculty to give test reports, adjustment
declarations and additionally assessment reports.

These prerequisites are additionally articulated in ISO/IEC 17011. License bodies
are expected to keep a rundown of faculty that their certify research centers and
investigation organizations have approved to sign test reports, adjustment
endorsements or potentially examination reports (approved signatories).

1 ukjas strategy on approved signatories page 0001

Approved signatories should show a sound information on the tests, adjustments or
reviews, and the research center’s or investigation office’s own administration
framework prerequisites. Approved signatories are faculty liable for supporting test
reports, alignment endorsements and additionally investigation reports, and are
generally administrative or administrative staff. Giving the name of each and every test
or alignment professional or auditor that signs reports isn’t required. Just faculty in the
research center’s or assessment office’s own hierarchical design who are liable for the
information and for answering inquiries from clients or administrative authorities should
be distinguished.

Licensed research facilities and examination organizations should keep a rundown of
their momentum approved signatories. At the point when massive changes happen,
(i.e., changes at an administrative or the board level influencing certification status)
UKJAS will be speedily told. UKJAS assessors will audit this rundown during ordinary
reconnaissance evaluations and reassessments.

1 ukjas strategy on approved signatories page 0002

 

APPROVED SIGNATORIES

UK Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel.: +448369083940
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

MUMBAI Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel.: +7499991895
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR , Haryana
Tel.: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.ukjas.com

Branches

1 ukjas strategy on approved signatories page 0003

References

  1. ^ στρατηγία, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus
  2. ^ Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 251. ISBN 9780850451634.
  3. ^ Heuser, Beatrice (14 October 2010). The evolution of strategy : thinking war from antiquity to the present (Illustrated ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN 978-0-52-115524-3.
  4. Jump up to:a b Freedman, Lawrence (2013). Strategy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-932515-3.
  5. ^ Simeone, Luca (3 July 2020). “Characterizing Strategic Design Processes in Relation to Definitions of Strategy from Military, Business and Management Studies” (PDF)The Design Journal23 (4): 515–534. doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1758472S2CID 218922359.
  6. Jump up to:a b Mintzberg, Henry and, Quinn, James Brian (1996). The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases. Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-132-340304.
  7. Jump up to:a b Henry Mintzberg (May 1978). “Patterns in Strategy Formation” (PDF)Management Science24 (9): 934–48. doi:10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934S2CID 154086210. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2013. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  8. ^ Henrik von Scheel and Prof Mark von Rosing. Importance of a Business Model (pp. 23–54). Applying real-world BPM in an SAP environment. ISBN 978-1-59229-877-8
  9. ^ Kvint, Vladimir (2009). The Global Emerging Market: Strategic Management and Economics. Routeledge. ISBN 9780203882917the global emerging market.
  10. ^ Liddell Hart, B. H. Strategy London: Faber, 1967 (2nd rev ed.) p. 321
  11. ^ Wilson, Andrew (2012). Masters of War: History’s Greatest Strategic Thinkers. The Teaching Company.
  12. ^ Freedman, Lawrence. (2 September 2013). Strategy : a history. Oxford. ISBN 9780199349906OCLC 858282187.
  13. ^ Giles, Lionel The Art of War by Sun Tzu. Special Edition Books. 2007.
  14. Jump up to:a b c Stigall, Dan E.; Miller, Chris; Donnatucci, Lauren (7 October 2019). “The 2018 U.S. National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Synoptic Overview”. American University National Security Law Brief. Washington DC. SSRN 3466967.
  15. ^ “2018 U.S. National Strategy for Counterterrorism” (PDF)whitehouse.gov. October 2018 – via National Archives.
  16. ^ “Counter-terrorism strategy (CONTEST) 2018”GOV.UK. 20 August 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  17. Jump up to:a b Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-684-84148-9.
  18. ^ Kiechel, Walter (2010). The Lords of Strategy. Harvard Business Press. ISBN 978-1-59139-782-3.
  19. ^ Ghemawat, Pankaj (Spring 2002). “Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective”Business History Review76 (1): 37–74. doi:10.2307/4127751JSTOR 4127751SSRN 264528.
  20. ^ Chandler, Alfred Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the history of industrial enterprise, Doubleday, New York, 1962.
  21. ^ Mintzberg, H. Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. Strategy Safari : A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, The Free Press, New York, 1998.
  22. ^ Stacey, R. D. (1995). “The science of complexity – an alter-native perspective for strategic change processes”. Strategic Management Journal16 (6): 477–95. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160606S2CID 16794111.
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Terra, L. A. A.; Passador, J. L. (2016). “Symbiotic Dynamic: The Strategic Problem from the Perspective of Complexity”. Systems Research and Behavioral Science33 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1002/sres.2379.
  24. ^ Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Éditionsdu Seuil.
  25. ^ Crouch, A. (1998). “Reframing the strategic problem: An accommodation of harmony and belligerence in strategic management”. Journal of Business Research41 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00007-6.
  26. ^ Porter, M. E. A. A. (1996). “What is strategy?”. Harvard Business Review74 (6): 61–78.
  27. ^ Mintzberg, H. (1987). “Crafting Strategy”. Harvard Business Review: 66–75.
  28. ^ Burnett, J.J. (1998). “A strategic approach to managing crises”. Public Relations Review24 (4): 475–488. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80112-X.
  29. ^ Mukherji, A.; Hurtado, P. (2001). “Interpreting, categorizing and responding to the environment: the role of culture in strategic problem definition”. Management Decision39 (2): 105–112. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005416.
  30. Jump up to:a b Stacey, R. D. (1995). “The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes”. Strategic Management Journal16 (6): 477–495. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160606.
  31. ^ Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Éditionsdu Seuil.
  32. ^ Stecey, R. D. (1996). “Emerging strategies for a chaotic environment”. Long Range Planning29 (2): 182–189. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(96)00006-4.
  33. ^ Stacey, R. D. (2005). The chaos frontier: creative strategic control for business. Malksham: Redwood Press.
  34. Jump up to:a b c Terra, L. A. A.; Passador, J. L. (2019). “The nature of social organization of production: From firms to complex dynamics”. Systems Research and Behavioral Science36 (4): 514–531. doi:10.1002/sres.2567S2CID 149946425.
  35. Jump up to:a b c Rumelt, Richard P. (2011). Good Strategy/Bad Strategy. Crown Business. ISBN 978-0-307-88623-1.
  36. ^ “American Rhetoric: John F. Kennedy – Cuban Missile Crisis Address to the Nation”.
  37. ^ Henderson, Bruce (1 January 1981). “The Concept of Strategy”Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved 18 April 2014.
  38. ^ Ben Polak Game Theory: Lecture 1 Transcript ECON 159, 5 September 2007, Open Yale Courses.
  39.  “John Hancock”Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  40. ^ 80 Corpus Juris Secundum, Signatures, sections 2 through 7
  41. ^ “Horton v. Murden, 117 Ga. 72”Caselaw Access Project. Harvard Law School. 1903. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  42. ^ “10 facts about the ‘autopen’ – POLITICO”Politico. 3 January 2013.
  43. ^ Armitage, Susie (2018-11-05). “Handwriting Disputes Cause Headaches for Some Absentee Voters”ProPublica. Retrieved 2020-06-01.
  44. ^ “Voting Outside the Polling Place: Absentee, All-Mail and Other Voting at Home Options”National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved 2024-11-05.
  45. ^ “What Is Automated Signature Verification?”SQN Banking Systems. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  46. ^ Mayhew, Stephen (2012-05-14). “Banks Are Now Embracing The Newer And Tougher Signature Verification System”Biometric Update. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  47. Jump up to:a b Srihari, Sangur (December 2010). Computational Methods for Handwritten Questioned Document Examination (Report). National Institute of Justice.
  48. ^ Smith, Daniel (2018-09-18). “Vote-By-Mail Ballots Cast in Florida” (PDF)ACLU-Florida. Retrieved 2020-06-01.
  49. ^ Wilkie, Jordan (2018-10-12). “Exclusive: High Rate of Absentee Ballot Rejection Reeks of Voter Suppression”Who What Why. Retrieved 2020-06-18.
  50. ^ “Sign Of The Times – One In Five Adults Don’t Have Their Own Signature”OSS Technology. 2018. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
  51. ^ These systems handle scanned (“offline”) signatures from multiple people (“WI, writer-independent”). Hafemann, Luiz G.; Sabourin, Robert; Oliveira, Luiz S. (2017-10-16). “Offline handwritten signature verification — Literature review”. 2017 Seventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA). IEEE. pp. 1–8. arXiv:1507.07909doi:10.1109/IPTA.2017.8310112ISBN 978-1-5386-1842-4S2CID 206932295.
  52. ^ Bibi, Kiran; Naz, Saeeda; Rehman, Arshia (2020-01-01). “Biometric signature authentication using machine learning techniques: Current trends, challenges and opportunities”Multimedia Tools and Applications79 (1): 289–340. doi:10.1007/s11042-019-08022-0ISSN 1573-7721S2CID 199576552.
  53. ^ Igarza, Juan; Goirizelaia, Iñaki; Espinosa, Koldo; Hernáez, Inmaculada; Méndez, Raúl; Sanchez, Jon (2003-11-26). Online Handwritten Signature Verification Using Hidden Markov Models. CIARP 2003. Vol. 2905. pp. 391–399. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24586-5_48.
  54. ^ “Signature Verification and Mail Ballots: Guaranteeing Access While Preserving Integrity” (PDF). Stanford University. 2020-04-15. Retrieved 2020-06-01.
  55. Jump up to:a b Sita, Jodi; Found, Bryan; Rogers, Douglas K. (September 2002). “Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Expertise for Signature Comparison”Journal of Forensic Sciences47 (5): 1117–1124. doi:10.1520/JFS15521JISSN 0022-1198PMID 12353558.
  56. Jump up to:a b Spilsbury, Sallie (2000). Media Law. Cavendish Publishing. p. p. 439ISBN 978-1-85941-530-6An individual’s signature may be protected under law as an artistic work. If so, the unauthorised reproduction of the signature will infringe copyright. The name itself will not be protected by copyright; it is the appearance of the signature which is protected.
  57. ^ Copyright Basics Archived 2011-03-05 at the Wayback Machine“, United States Copyright Office. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
Translate »
×