Saturday, November 23UKJAS

Green Building Rating Agency Accreditation Programme

 

Download PDF

UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd.

green building ratings in india

Green Building Rating Agency Accreditation Programme

Green Building for Accreditation

The UKJAS has arranged this update to keep you informed about a portion of the news
and occasions happening with the Green Building rating for Accreditation Review and
Certification (UKJAS 100001).

UKJAS 100001 Celebratory Letters to Building Divisions

Building offices can have a gigantic effect on the
timetable and cost of a development project. That is
the reason it is so critical that building offices are sure
about the capability of the development organization.
To this end, UKJAS will send a letter to building
divisions in purviews where there are organizations
licensed to UKJAS 100001. The letters will feature the
authorize organization and sum up the advantages of
the authorization for the structure division, building
proprietors and local area. A similar letter will be
shipped off the (IAF-AB) administrative delegates that
are working with building divisions worldwide. Most of
the structure divisions in the INDIA are individuals from
the IAF-AB and take on the building regulations
distributed and kept up with by the IAF-AB. UKJAS is
an auxiliary the IAF-AB and an individual from the
code chamber group of arrangements.

UKJAS 100001 Celebratory Letters to Building Divisions

Building Authorities from around the nation will go to
the Worldwide Code Chamber’s Yearly Gathering this
year both practically and face to face in Mumbai and
New Delhi. All things considered, this has been the
biggest social event of code authorities in the country.
As an auxiliary of IAF-AB and individual from the
Code Chambers Group of Arrangements, UKJAS will
be highlighted in advancements all through the
meeting to teach participants about the advantages
of the UKJAS Accreditation programs. UKJAS
100001 and notices will be displayed on separates
the enlistment region, meeting rooms, and other
regions that will stand out of the structure divisions
staffs going to this cross country occasion. The
current year’s meeting will highlight industry-driving
instructive meetings, exceptional organizing
occasions, moving featured subject matter experts
and memorable building visits. The meeting will
likewise remember hearings for the 2023 Worldwide
Codes. Going to the code hearings is an astounding
method for engaging in the code advancement
process. The hearings give a significant chance to
offer your aptitude and considerations on the most
recent advancements in incorporating and fire
wellbeing and their coordination into the I-Codes.

green building rating agency accreditation programme compressed page 0001

Particular or License – What starts things out?

For a very long time, the inquiry has been “Which
started things out? The Chicken or the Egg.” This
equivalent inquiry is being posed by organizations
pondering getting licensed. “Would it be advisable for
me I become certify first, or would it be advisable for
me I trust that clients will begin counting detail
language that requires certification?”

While one organization is as yet attempting to address
this inquiry, others are pushing forward with license.
They get it authorization will set the bar for
organizations gathering metal structures. At the point
when a potential client inquires “For what reason
would it be a good idea for me I pick your organization
throughout the following organization, you can give
a strong response with insights regarding being an
UKJAS Certify Metal Structure Constructing agent.
UKJAS is an autonomous, universally perceived
Accreditation Body (AB) that is a forerunner in the
development business and an auxiliary of the
International Code Council, the association that fosters
the structure codes. The license interaction confirms
that a constructing agent has the certified staff,
hardware, cycles and preparing to finish the work right.
You could in fact give them a copy of the UKJAS
Endorsement of License and UKJAS 100001
Accreditation standard.

All in all, the solution to the inquiry ought to be that the
constructing agent ought to initially become authorize,
before the detail language requires authorization.

For what reason should your organization get licensed to
UKJAS 100001?

There are many motivations to get authorize to UKJAS
100001 by UKJAS. One of the most compelling
motivations is to give your organization an edge over
contenders. Each organization is attempting to
separate themselves from the wide range of various
organizations raising metal structures. While cost is
significant, you would rather not become known as the
least bidder when you are offering great administration
and experience. The most ideal way to bring issues to
light about your administration is to feature your
UKJAS license. UKJAS is a universally perceived, free
authorization body, and an auxiliary of the International
Code Council (IAF-AB), distributers of the building
regulations utilized all through the INDIA. Learn about
a greater amount of the advantages of becoming
certify on the UKJAS site.

The reason for the gathering is to
present the UKJAS Green Building
Rating Review Certification
Program (too know known as
UKJAS 100001) and give an open
door to conversation between Green
Building Rating agency, standard developer, building
proprietors and controllers about the Green Building
Rating. Desire to see you there.

IAF-AB Developing Help for Certification

In the event that you are an individual from the
Building Rating Project workers what’s more,
Erectors Affiliation, then, at that point, you definitely
know that the association is serious areas of strength
for an of license. the IAF-AB was instrumental in
working with UKJAS and other industry bunches like
the Green Building Rating Makers Relationship to
foster the rules (UKJAS 100001) that is the reason
for license. Presently, like never before, the IAF-AB is 
supporting organizations that are chasing after
certification. For additional subtleties about their help,
visit https://www.iaf-ab.org

IAF-AB Certification

International Accreditation Forum for Accreditation
Body (IAF-AB) fills in as the voice of the Green
Building Rating frameworks industry, giving
administration, examination, and schooling to
increment the noticeable quality and utilization of
Green Building Rating frameworks. Its individuals
incorporate organizations like Green Building
Frameworks, Head servant Makers, Green
Structures, Foundation and other extraordinary
organizations. IAF-AB Building Frameworks part
firms utilize in excess of 11,000 individuals in 75
assembling plants. These organizations participate in
the plan, assembling and offer of Green Structures
frameworks.

LinkedIn Group for UKJAS 100001

If you are on LinkedIn and need to jump into the conversation about UKJAS 100001 Authorization,
join our Gathering that is named UKJAS 100001 Authorization for Green Building Rating as per International
Green Building Code.

green building rating agency accreditation programme compressed page 0002

In 2007, the IAF-AB made it a prerequisite for all of the
Building Frameworks individuals to become certify
under the UKJAS 100001 program. This program
checks organizations are equipped to plan and
manufactured pre-designed Greenl Building
frameworks. Hence, presently a significant number of
these IAF-AB part organizations are seeing the
advantages of having an organization licensed under
the UKJAS 100001 program collect their planned
structures. It is not difficult to perceive how this is a
triumphant recipe for organizations that plan, create
and collect Green Building Structures frameworks.
an extraordinary supporter and individual from the
audit advisory group for the two projects said it best
while composing an article named “UKJAS 100001.

IAF-AB Learn Live – A Cross country Schooling Occasion

The IAF-AB will hold Learn Live, a virtual schooling
occasion, this October every year. This occasion will
incorporate a progression of instructive introductions
about the most major problems and needs for building
security experts, counting a show from UKJAS,
early afternoon, named “Supporting Designed Green
Building Structures Frameworks and Get together with
UKJAS Licenses.” This program will help building
divisions to support the plan, manufacture and get
together of Green Building Structures frameworks
based on two UKJAS License programs
(UKJAS 100001) and the Global Construction
regulation. Find out more and sign up.

Building Authorities Advantage from UKJAS 100001 – The Article

Recently, UKJAS put an article named “Building
authorities benefit from UKJAS 100001 in low-ascent
development” that was distributed in the IAF-AB’s
Structure Wellbeing Diary, an online magazine
that arrives at huge number of building offices around
Worldwide. UKJAS has reformatted this article into pdf
arrangement and put it on our site for simple download
that can be printed, messaged or put on sites.

International Green Building Exibition

On the off chance that you are
going to IGBE, in Mumbai, make
certain to come by and say “Hi” to
UKJAS. We will be in show in the
exhibition to give data for participants about the
UKJAS 100001 programs. UKJAS, IAF-AB and
IGBE will likewise be giving a show, Green Building
Industry Setting the Bar with UKJAS 100001, the
training program.

Certify Companies

The accompanying organizations have been
authorize and others are all the while. For more
data about turning into an UKJAS 100001 Authorize
Green Building Rating Agency, contact UKJAS
or IAF-AB today

green building rating agency accreditation programme compressed page 0003

Advance Your Certification with the UKJAS Mark

Organizations certify by UKJAS can
advance their authorization utilizing
the UKJAS Certification Imprint. The
Imprint can be shown on Letter head, organization
sites, flyers, business cards, signs, clothing, reports,
and so forth.

This iconic logo incorporates a realistic portrayal of
the UKJAS logo with the words “UKJAS Accredited”
There are two variant accessible for each imprint.
The first variant is a level organization showing the
phrasing to the side of the logo. The subsequent
choice is an upward design showing the phrasing
beneath the imprint.

Licensed organizations can get a copy of the UKJAS
License Imprint by sending an email to
[email protected]. If it’s not too much trouble, make
certain to incorporate the name of your organization,
the license program, and license number.

We couldn’t imagine anything better than to perceive
how you are utilizing the UKJAS mark. It may indeed,
even be remembered for a future issue of the UKJAS
pamphlet. So if it’s not too much trouble, send
pictures to [email protected].

More Data about License

In the event that your organization isn’t now
authorize, right now is an ideal opportunity to apply
so you can exploit the many advantages given to
authorize organizations. For more data about turning
into an UKJAS 100001Accreditation programme
Green Building Rating Agency, contact UKJAS today

green building rating agency accreditation programme compressed page 0004

 

 

UK Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel.: +448369083940
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

 

MUMBAI Head Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel.: +7499991895
email: [email protected]
Website: www.ukjas.com

 

DELHI-NCR Regd. Office
UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )
UKJAS House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR , Haryana
Tel.: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: www.ukjas.com

Branches

green building rating agency accreditation programme compressed page 0005

 

Download PDF

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Basic Information”. Green Building. US EPA. Archived from the original on 2021-03-28. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
  2. ^ Yan Ji and Stellios Plainiotis (2006): Design for Sustainability. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. ISBN 7-112-08390-7
  3. ^ Hu M, Skibniewski MJ (April 22, 2021). “A Review of Building Construction Cost Research: Current Status, Gaps and Green Buildings”. Green Building & Construction Economics. 2 (1): 1–17. doi:10.37256/gbce.212021. ISSN 2737-5021.
  4. ^ “EDGE Buildings | Build and Brand Green”. www.edgebuildings.com. Archived from the original on 2019-11-20. Retrieved 2019-09-18.
  5. ^ Hopkins, R. 2002. A Natural Way of Building. Archived 2008-02-03 at the Wayback Machine Transition Culture. Retrieved: 2007-03-30.
  6. ^ Allen, E, & Iano, J. (2008). Fundamentals of building construction: materials and methods. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  7. ^ “GSA Public Buildings Service Assessing Green Building Performance” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-07-22.
  8. ^ “2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector – Executive Summary”. 2020.
  9. ^ Nord, Natasa (2017), “Building Energy Efficiency in Cold Climates”, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, Elsevier, pp. 149–157, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10190-3, ISBN 978-0-12-804792-7, retrieved 2022-04-04
  10. ^ Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction; International Energy Agency; United Nations Environment Programme (2019). “2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction Towards a zero-emissions, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector” (PDF). UN environment programme Document Repository. United Nations Environment Programme. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-20.
  11. ^ Tapper, James (July 28, 2019). “Experts call for ban on glass skyscrapers to save energy in climate crisis”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2019-07-28. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  12. ^ “Wasteful steel-and-glass buildings fuel global climate injustice, says climate expert”. phys.org. October 19, 2019. Archived from the original on 2021-10-19. Retrieved 2021-09-07.
  13. ^ “Buildings – Analysis”.
  14. ^ Goodhew S 2016 Sustainable Construction Processes A Resource Text. John Wiley & Son
  15. ^ Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings GLOBAL STATUS REPORT 2016 (PDF). Global Alliance for Buildings and construction. 2016. p. 8. Retrieved 2022-04-01.
  16. ^ Sun, Yefei; Yan, Cuishunping; Xing, Haoyun (2024). “Can green buildings reduce carbon dioxide emissions?”. Energy. 312: 133613. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133613.
  17. ^ Watson, Donald (2013), Loftness, Vivian; Haase, Dagmar (eds.), “Bioclimatic Designbioclimaticdesign”, Sustainable Built Environments, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–30, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5828-9_225, ISBN 978-1-4614-5828-9, retrieved 2023-07-12
  18. ^ “Bioclimatic architecture, buildings that respect the environment”. Iberdrola. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  19. ^ “World’s second largest building, Shanghai Tower, achieves LEED Platinum | U.S. Green Building Council”. www.usgbc.org. Retrieved 2021-12-10.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Mao, Xiaoping; Lu, Huimin; Li, Qiming (2009). “A Comparison Study of Mainstream Sustainable/Green Building Rating Tools in the World”. 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science. p. 1. doi:10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5303546. ISBN 978-1-4244-4638-4. S2CID 22176705.
  21. ^ Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. N.p.: Houghton Mifflin, 1962. Print.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b “Components of Green Building”. Green Building. US EPA. Archived from the original on 2008-10-31. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  23. ^ WBDG Sustainable Committee (March 8, 2018). “Sustainable: OVERVIEW”. Whole Building Design Guide. Archived from the original on 2020-03-10.
  24. ^ Ilgin, Mehmet Ali; Gupta, Surendra M. (2010). “Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and Product Recovery (ECMPRO): A Review of the State of the Art”. Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (3): 563–591. Bibcode:2010JEnvM..91..563I. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037. PMID 19853369. Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a method used to evaluate the environmental impact of a product through its life cycle encompassing extraction and processing of the raw materials, manufacturing, distribution, use, recycling, and final disposal[verification needed]
  25. ^ “ISO 14040:2006(en) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework”. www.iso.org. Archived from the original on 2016-06-17. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  26. ^ Khasreen, Mohamad; Banfill, Phillip F.; Menzies, Gillian (2009). “Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review”. Sustainability. 1 (3): 674–701. doi:10.3390/su1030674.
  27. ^ Hegazy, T. (2002). Life-cycle stages of projects. Computer-Based Construction Project Management, 8.
  28. ^ Pushkar, S; Becker, R; Katz, A (2005). “A methodology for design of environmentally optimal buildings by variable grouping”. Building and Environment. 40 (8): 1126. Bibcode:2005BuEnv..40.1126P. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.09.004.
  29. ^ “NREL: U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database Home Page”. www.nrel.gov. Archived from the original on 2009-03-18. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
  30. ^ “Naturally:wood Building Green with Wood Module 3 Energy Conservation” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-22.
  31. ^ Simpson, J.R. (November 2002). “Improved Estimates of tree-shade effects on residential energy use”. Energy and Buildings. 34 (10): 1067–1076. Bibcode:2002EneBu..34.1067S. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00028-2.
  32. ^ Gan, Vincent J. L.; Lo, Irene M. C.; Ma, Jun; Tse, K. T.; Cheng, Jack C. P.; Chan, C. M. (May 1, 2020). “Simulation optimisation towards energy efficient green buildings: Current status and future trends”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 254: 120012. Bibcode:2020JCPro.25420012G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120012. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 214281706.
  33. ^ “More efficient and flexible buildings are key to clean energy transitions – Analysis”. IEA. April 4, 2024. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
  34. ^ IEA (2024), More efficient and flexible buildings are key to clean energy transitions, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/commentaries/more-efficient-and-flexible-buildings-are-key-to-clean-energy-transitions, Licence: CC BY 4.0
  35. ^ Lockhart, Olga (February 2019). “4 Main Health & Green Building Benefits For Homeowners”. PATHWAY. Retrieved 2020-09-18.
  36. ^ Jump up to:a b “Green Building Basics”. California Integrated Waste Management Board. January 23, 2008. Archived from the original on 2009-12-10. Retrieved 2009-11-28.
  37. ^ Abera, Yonatan Ayele (2024). “Sustainable building materials: A comprehensive study on eco-friendly alternatives for construction”. Composites and Advanced Materials. 33. doi:10.1177/26349833241255957.
  38. ^ Jonkers, Henk M (2007). “Self Healing Concrete: A Biological Approach”. Self Healing Materials. Springer Series in Materials Science. Vol. 100. p. 195. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6250-6_9. ISBN 978-1-4020-6249-0. S2CID 133848154.
  39. ^ GUMBEL, PETER (December 4, 2008). “Building Materials: Cementing the Future”. Archived from the original on 2008-12-05 – via www.time.com.
  40. ^ Palankar, Nitendra; Ravi Shankar, A. U.; Mithun, B. M. (December 1, 2015). “Studies on eco-friendly concrete incorporating industrial waste as aggregates”. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 4 (2): 378–390. Bibcode:2015IJSBE…4..378P. doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.05.002. ISSN 2212-6090. S2CID 135944819.
  41. ^ Kuittinen, Matti; Zernicke, Caya; Slabik, Simon; Hafner, Annette (March 11, 2021). “How can carbon be stored in the built environment? A review of potential options”. Architectural Science Review. 66 (2): 91–107. doi:10.1080/00038628.2021.1896471. ISSN 0003-8628. S2CID 233617364.
  42. ^ “Five actions to improve the sustainability of steel”. www.ey.com. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  43. ^ Dennehymarch, Kevin (March 31, 2014). “Using more wood for construction can slash global reliance on fossil fuels”. Yale News. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies (F&ES), University of Washington’s College of the Environment. Archived from the original on 2021-08-15. Retrieved 2021-08-15.
  44. ^ Carrington, Damian (July 7, 2022). “Plant-based meat by far the best climate investment, report finds”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2022-07-10.
  45. ^ Humphreys, K.; Mahasenan, M. (March 1, 2002). “Towards a sustainable cement industry. Substudy 8: climate change”. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  46. ^ “Sustainable Facilities Tool: Relevant Mandates and Rating Systems”. sftool.gov. Archived from the original on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-07-03.
  47. ^ Lee, Young S; Guerin, Denise A (2010). “Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US”. Building and Environment. 45 (5): 1104. Bibcode:2010BuEnv..45.1104L. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.019.
  48. ^ KMC Controls (September 24, 2015). “What’s Your IQ on IAQ and IEQ?”. Archived from the original on 2021-04-12. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  49. ^ “LEED – Eurofins Scientific”. www.eurofins.com. Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2011-08-23.
  50. ^ “HQE – Eurofins Scientific”. www.eurofins.com. Archived from the original on 2017-07-03. Retrieved 2011-08-23.
  51. ^ “LEED – Eurofins Scientific”. www.eurofins.com. Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2011-08-23.
  52. ^ “BREEAM – Eurofins Scientific”. www.eurofins.com. Archived from the original on 2018-10-01. Retrieved 2011-08-23.
  53. ^ “IAQ Green Certification”. Archived from the original on 2013-12-05. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  54. ^ “LEED – U.S. Green Building Council”. www.usgbc.org. Archived from the original on 2013-12-19.
  55. ^ (CalRecycle), California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. “Green Building HomeGreen Building: Section 01350”. www.calrecycle.ca.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-12-12. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  56. ^ “Best Practices Manual – CHPS.net”. www.chps.net. Archived from the original on 2013-12-11. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  57. ^ “About « BIFMA level Standard”. levelcertified.org. Archived from the original on 2013-12-05. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  58. ^ Faith, S. (April 4, 2018). “Health Risks Associated With Poor Indoor Air Quality”. Home Air Care. Archived from the original on 2020-02-09. Retrieved 2019-09-18.
  59. ^ WBDG Sustainable Committee. (August 18, 2009). Sustainable. Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://www.wbdg.org/design/ieq.php Archived 2009-12-23 at the Wayback Machine
  60. ^ “Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America Home Remodelling”. Archived from the original on 2011-04-22.
  61. ^ “Naturally:wood Building Green with Wood Module 6 Health and Wellbeing” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-04-02.
  62. ^ “Indoor Air – Wiley Online Library”. www.blackwellpublishing.com. Archived from the original on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2011-05-09.
  63. ^ WBDG Sustainable Committee. (August 18, 2009). Sustainable. Retrieved November 28, 2009, from http://www.wbdg.org/design/optimize_om.php Archived 2010-02-17 at the Wayback Machine
  64. ^ “Building Operations and Maintenance Services – GSA Sustainable Facilities Tool”. sftool.gov. Archived from the original on 2015-07-02. Retrieved 2015-07-01.
  65. ^ Jump up to:a b Kats, Greg; Alevantis, Leon; Berman, Adam; Mills, Evan; Perlman, Jeff (October 2003). The Cost and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-27. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  66. ^ “In Business magazine Green Builders Get Big Help from Deconstruction”. Archived from the original on 2008-11-21.
  67. ^ “Naturally:wood Building Green with Wood Module 5 Durability and Adaptability” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-05-17.
  68. ^ Otterpohl, Ralf; Grottker, Matthias; Lange, Jörg (1997). “Sustainable water and waste management in urban areas”. Water Science and Technology. 35 (9). doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00190-X.
  69. ^ Liu, Lei; Ledwich, Gerard; Miller, Wendy (November 22, 2016). Community centre improvement to reduce air conditioning peak demand. 7th International Conference on Energy and Environment of Residential Buildings, 20–24 November 2016, Brisbane, Australia. doi:10.4225/50/58107ce163e0c.
  70. ^ Miller, Wendy; Liu, Lei Aaron; Amin, Zakaria; Gray, Matthew (2018). “Involving occupants in net-zero-energy solar housing retrofits: An Australian sub-tropical case study”. Solar Energy. 159: 390. Bibcode:2018SoEn..159..390M. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.008.
  71. ^ Kats, Gregory. (September 24, 2010). Costs and Benefits of Green Buildings [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2010/09/24/205805/costs-and-benefits-of-green-buildings/# Archived 2014-03-24 at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ “Green Buildings – Challenges”. California Sustainability Alliance. Archived from the original on 2010-12-19. Retrieved 2010-06-16.
  73. ^ Fedrizzi, Rick, “Intro – What LEED Measures.” United States Green Building Council, October 11, 2009.
  74. ^ Green building impacts worker productivity. (2012). CAD/CAM Update, 24(5), 7-8.
  75. ^ Boué, George (July 8, 2010). “Linking Green Buildings, Productivity and the Bottom Line”. Greenbiz. Archived from the original on 2021-05-10. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
  76. ^ United States Green Building Council (July 27, 2012). “The Business Case for Green Building”. Archived from the original on 2014-03-24. Retrieved 2014-03-09.
  77. ^ Langdon, Davis. The Cost of Green Revisited. Publication. 2007.
  78. ^ Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat. Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Property Values. 2009. [1] Archived 2021-11-23 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved: November 5, 2010
  79. ^ Pivo, Gary; Fisher, Jeffrey D. Investment Returns from Responsible Property Investments: Energy Efficient, Transit-oriented and Urban Regeneration Office Properties in the US from 1998-2008. 2009.[2] Archived 2011-07-24 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved: November 5, 2010
  80. ^ Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat. An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates. 2009.[3] Archived 2011-02-21 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved: November 5, 2010
  81. ^ “Naturally:wood Building Green and the Benefits of Wood” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-05-29.
  82. ^ “ICC – International Code Council”. www.iccsafe.org. Archived from the original on 2010-09-14. Retrieved 2021-11-23.
  83. ^ Graaf, Florijn (May 23, 2018). “SmartHood: the self-sufficient neighborhood of the future”. Amsterdam smart city platform. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2021-02-04.
  84. ^ Salzano, Miabelle. “THE NETHERLANDS WILL SOON BE HOME TO A SELF-SUSTAINING ECO VILLAGE”. Builder. ARCHITECT. Archived from the original on 2021-11-23. Retrieved 2021-02-04.
  85. ^ Kadave, P.; Pathak, P.; Pawar, S. (2012). “Planning and Design of Green Village”. S2CID 130536873. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  86. ^ “IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”. www.ipcc.ch. Archived from the original on 2017-09-15. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  87. ^ Reykjavík Energy / Orkuveita Reykjavíkur. “History of the hot water / Saga heita vatnsins” (PDF). Reykjavík Energy. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
  88. ^ Palumbo, Jacqui. “Is this 3D-printed home made of clay the future of housing?”. CNN. Archived from the original on 2021-06-06. Retrieved 2021-05-09.
  89. ^ “Active House”. International Active House Alliance.
Translate »
×