Friday, November 22UKJAS

Search Results for: Auditing

Corporate Governance

Is the collection of mechanisms, processes and relations used by various parties to control and to operate a corporation Governance structures and principles identify the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation (such as the board of directors, managers, shareholders, creditors, auditors, regulators, and other stakeholders) and include the rules and procedures for making decisions in corporate affairs. Corporate governance is necessary because of the possibility of conflicts of interests between stakeholders, primarily between shareholders and upper management or among shareholders. Corporate governance includes the processes through which corporations’ objectives are set and pursued in the context of the social, regulatory and market environment. These include monitoring the actions, policies, practices, and decisions of corporations, their agents, and affected stakeholders. Corporate governance practices can be seenas attempts to align the interests of stakeholders Interest in the corporate governance practices of modern corporations, particularly in relation to accountability, increased following the high-profile collapses of a number of large corporations in 2001–2002, many of which involved accounting fraud; and then again after the financial crisis in 2008. What is Required Corporate Governance Required corporate governance refers to the mandatory rules, regulations, and standards that companies must adhere to in order to ensure proper governance. These requirements are often set by laws, regulatory bodies, and stock exchanges, and they vary by jurisdiction. Key elements of required corporate governance include: 1. Legal Compliance 2. Board Composition and Structure 3. Financial Reporting and Disclosure 4. Shareholder Rights and Protections 5. Ethics and Compliance Programs 6. Risk Management and Internal Controls 7. Stakeholder Engagement 8. Executive Compensation 9. Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policies 10. Sustainability and ESG Reporting These requirements ensure that companies are managed responsibly and transparently, protecting the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders while reducing the risk of corporate misconduct. The specifics of required corporate governance can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the industry in which the company operates. Who is Required Corporate Governance “Who” is required corporate governance refers to the entities and individuals within an organization that are responsible for ensuring that corporate governance practices are followed. These roles are typically filled by key stakeholders within the company, as well as external parties who oversee the organization’s governance. Here are the main players involved in required corporate governance: 1. Board of Directors 2. Audit Committee 3. CEO and Senior Management 4. Company Secretary 5. External Auditors 6. Shareholders 7. Regulatory Bodies 8. Internal Auditors 9. Compliance Officers 10. Stakeholders 11. Legal Advisors These entities and individuals collectively ensure that required corporate governance standards are met. Their roles are crucial in fostering a culture of accountability, transparency, and ethical conduct within the organization. When is Required Corporate Governance “When is required corporate governance” refers to the various situations, timeframes, and triggers that mandate the implementation or adherence to corporate governance practices. These moments or periods can include regular, ongoing obligations as well as specific events or milestones that necessitate a focus on governance. Here are key instances when required corporate governance comes into play: 1. At Company Formation 2. Ongoing Compliance 3. When Going Public (Initial Public Offering – IPO) 4. During Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) 5. In Response to Regulatory Changes 6. Following a Corporate Scandal or Crisis 7. When Raising Capital 8. At Major Corporate Events 9. In Response to Shareholder Activism 10. During Regular Governance Reviews 11. For Regulatory Filings and Audits 12. During ESG Reporting and CSR Initiatives 13. In Crisis Management and Risk Events 14. Upon Regulatory Enforcement Actions In summary, required corporate governance is an ongoing responsibility that intensifies at key moments in a company’s lifecycle. It ensures that the company operates legally, ethically, and in the best interests of its stakeholders, especially during times of change, growth, or crisis. Where is Required Corporate Governance “Where is required corporate governance” refers to the various contexts, locations, and settings in which corporate governance practices are mandated or necessary. These locations include specific types of organizations, geographic regions, and regulatory environments where governance rules must be followed. Here’s a breakdown of where required corporate governance typically applies: 1. Publicly Listed Companies 2. Private Companies 3. Financial Institutions 4. Multinational Corporations 5. Government-Owned Enterprises (State-Owned Enterprises) 6. Non-Profit Organizations 7. Regulated Industries 8. Corporate Headquarters 9. Subsidiaries and Regional Offices 10. Regulatory and Governmental Settings 11. Investor and Shareholder Meetings 12. Educational and Professional Institutions 13. ESG and Sustainability Reporting 14. Legal Jurisdictions In summary, required corporate governance applies across a wide range of settings, including public and private companies, government entities, non-profits, and specific industries. The “where” of required governance is determined by the company’s legal obligations, the nature of its business, and the expectations of its stakeholders. Compliance is crucial in all these locations to ensure that the company operates legally, ethically, and effectively. How is Required Corporate Governance “How is required corporate governance” refers to the methods, processes, and mechanisms through which corporate governance is implemented and enforced within an organization. It involves a combination of internal practices, external regulations, and oversight mechanisms to ensure that companies are managed responsibly, ethically, and transparently. Here’s how required corporate governance is typically established and maintained: 1. Establishing a Governance Framework 2. Board of Directors Oversight 3. Financial Reporting and Transparency 4. Internal Controls and Audits 5. External Audits and Independent Verification 6. Regulatory Compliance 7. Shareholder Engagement and Rights 8. Risk Management 9. Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct 10. Whistleblower Protections 11. Stakeholder Engagement 12. Executive Compensation and Incentives 13. Training and Development 14. Regular Governance Reviews 15. Corrective Actions and Continuous Improvement In summary, required corporate governance is implemented through a combination of well-defined structures, ongoing oversight, and regular evaluations. It involves collaboration between the board of directors, management, shareholders, regulators, and other stakeholders to ensure that the company operates responsibly, ethically, and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Case Study on Corporate Governance Enron Corporation Enron Corporation was a once-powerful American energy company that collapsed in 2001 due to a massive accounting fraud and corporate governance scandal. This case study highlights the severe consequences of corporate misconduct and the importance of strong corporate governance practices. Key Issues: Consequences: Lessons Learned: The Enron case serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of corporate misconduct and the importance of strong corporate governance practices. White paper on Corporate Governance The Imperative of Robust Corporate Governance Executive Summary Corporate governance, a framework that ensures companies are managed in an ethical and responsible

FQA Certification Bodies

  Download PDF UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd. FQA Certification Bodies Bodies Giving The Review And The Certificate Of The Fastener Quality AssuranceSystem ( ISO 9001 And ISO 16426 ) Covered By The Most Recent Fastener QualityAct (FQA) The Fastener Quality Act (FQA) Public Fafety: • Expecting That Specific Fasteners Sold In Business Adjust To The Determinations To   Which They Are Addressed To Be Produced.• Accommodating Certification Of Laboratories Took Part In Fastener Testing.• Requiring Review, Testing, And Certificate, As Per Standardized Methods. Ukjas Accreditation Expects That Certificate Bodies For The Fastener QualityAssurance System Covered By The Most Recent FQA: • Iso/iec 17021-1:latest – Congruity Appraisal – Necessities For Bodies Giving Review  And Certificate Of The Management Systems.• Iso 19011:latest – Rules For Auditing Management System.• Accreditation Body Applying For The Fastener Quality Assurance System  Accreditation Should Be Accredited By Ukjas For Iso 9001 Quality Management  System Or Be An Candidate For Authorization With Ukjas For Iso 9001 Quality  Management Systems.• Ukjas Accreditation Scheme Manual.• Ukjas Strategy On License Of Certificate Bodies Forfastener Quality Assurance  Framework And Laboratories For Fastener Testing. References Armand Vallin Feigenbaum. Total quality control: engineering and management McGraw-Hill, 1951 pg. 542     UK Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseC/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UKTel.: +448369083940email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   MUMBAI Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseB-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)Tel.: +7499991895email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   DELHI-NCR Regd. OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseAsaoti, Dist Palwal Faridabad Delhi NCR , HaryanaTel.: +91-7979801035Fax: +91-250 2341170 Website: www.ukjas.com Branches   Download PDF

UKJAS Policy for Transition

  Download PDF UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd. UKJAS Strategy for Progress of Licensed Confirmation Exercises for Theexecutives Framework Accreditation Bodies (MSCB) Guaranteeing FrameworksAs per ISO 9001:Latest, ISO 14001:Latest, ISO 50001:Latest, ISO 50003:Latestand ISO 13485:Latest This approach applies to all UKJAS-authorize The executives Framework AccreditationBodies and is expected to frame proposals for the progress cycle to the most up todate adaptations of the beneath recorded norms as per the IAF-AB Goals. Note: For data on CBs progress to ISO/IEC 17021-1:Latest, if it’s not too much trouble,see the UKJAS site for the Arrangement on Change to ISO/IEC 17021-1:Latest. ISO 9001:Latest – Quality administration frameworks – Necessities ISO 14001:Latest – Ecological administration frameworks – Necessities with directionfor use ISO 50001:Latest – Energy the board frameworks – Necessities with direction for useISO 50003:Latest – Energy the board frameworks – Necessities for bodies givingreview and accreditation of energy the executives frameworks Required Date of Progress for ISO 50003:Latest ISO 13485:Latest – Medical Devices – Quality administration frameworks –Prerequisites for administrative purposes Required Date of Change for ISO 13485:Latest CB Examiner Capability Examiners and staff will get preparing to dive more deeply into the new norms. The CBis liable for check of this instructional class’ adequacy. Note: Preparing and confirmation of reviewers and staff should be finished precedingplaying out a review to the new standard forms. Correspondence Correspondence during these progress periods will be the way in to theCB’s fruitful exchange of their clients and execution of the new principlesfor review rehearses. CBs are prescribed to convey any worries andadditionally inquiries to the public standard improvement associations as well asAuthorization Bodies in their economies. Additionally, CBs are urged to keep up withcorrespondence with other CBs concerning sharing progress techniques. At long last,CBs ought to prescribe to their affirmed clients potential techniques to utilize whileworking with this progress and ought to be empowering new and existing clients toexecute the most current standard forms as quickly as time permits. Accreditation Documentation CBs are prescribed to start refreshing their review confirmation documentation to mirrorthe most up to date standard variants quickly. This incorporates: agendas, reports andsome other specialized documentation utilized during a review. Recertification For those clients previously guaranteed by the CB, the CB ought to furnish them withthe proposed courses of action for overhauling their confirmations to the fresheststandard renditions. These game plans include: the means by which proceeded withconfirmation will be thought of (i.e., single visit, multi stage approach, and so on), atime span for when recertification reviews should be planned, and any new necessitiesoccupant upon the client to furnish the CB as per the new standard variants. Kindlyremember the connection between the change time of the new norms and therecertification cycle utilized by your association. It could be useful to design thefollowing recertification review to correspond with the change time frame dates forexisting clients. Records of Temporary Exercises The CB will track any temporary exercises, instruments and declarations made to theirclients. This data will be explored at the following nearby appraisal of the CB toguarantee that the CB is finding a way sufficient ways to illuminate their clientsregarding the momentary necessities. Progress Disappointment As expected by the IAF-AB Goals settled upon by the IAF-AB MLA signatorycertification bodies, CBs will have methodology set up to guarantee that in case of aclient being not able to finish the change cycle inside the distributed time span remedialactivity is started and really executed. The ramifications for these clients aresurrendered to the CB’s circumspection, be that as it may, no certify confirmations willbe given to clients in conformance with the past variant of the standard once thetemporary time frame has finished. To refresh a confirmation to the new norm, the CB’sensured client should be on favorable terms as for restorative activities recognized atany past reviews before progress can be thought of. The CB will track conclusion ofdiscoveries recently distinguished to guarantee the trustworthiness of the changeinteraction. Accessibility of License Reports All UKJAS-certify MSCBs who offer confirmation to the previouslymentioned norms are expected to get a duplicate of the new worldwideguidelines which might be bought from important standard bodies, includingthe International Code ISO store. Authorization Standards The ongoing UKJAS Authorization Rules for The board Framework Certificate Bodies(UKJAS 10002) has been reconsidered to incorporate reference to the recentlyrefreshed guidelines. UKJAS 10002 has gone through publication changes as for thenew guidelines also. Kindly look into the record, accessible on the UKJAS site at:http://www.ukjas.com  Partner and Client Commitment All on-going correspondence and updates basic to the fruitful finish of the change willbe posted on the UKJAS website. Cbs are urged to start this change interaction with their clients at the earliestopportunity. Assuming there are any inquiries, kindly direct them to UKJAS CollaboratorAuthorization Official,DELHI-NCR Regd. OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseAsaoti, Dist PalwalFaridabad Delhi NCR , HaryanaTel.: +91-7979801035Fax: +91-250 2341170Website: www.ukjas.com     UK Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseC/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UKTel.: +448369083940email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   MUMBAI Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseB-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)Tel.: +7499991895email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   DELHI-NCR Regd. OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseAsaoti, Dist Palwal Faridabad Delhi NCR , HaryanaTel.: +91-7979801035Fax: +91-250 2341170 Website: www.ukjas.com Branches   Download PDF Reference  Good_Strategy_Bad_Strategy The_Progress_Principle  Poksinska, Bozena; Dahlgaard, Jens Jörn; Antoni, Marc (2002). “The state of ISO 9000 certification: A study of Swedish organizations”. The TQM Magazine. 14 (5): 297. doi:10.1108/09544780210439734. ^ International Organization for Standardization, What is the ISO 9000 family of standards on quality management?, accessed on 20 September 2024 ^ Eicher, L. D., The ISO 9000 family of International Standards, Accred Qual Assur 2, 1997, p. 325, doi:10.1007/s007690050157, accessed on 20 September 2024 ^ Jump up to:a b Tsim, Y.C.; Yeung, V.W.S.; Leung, Edgar T.C. (2002). “An adaptation to ISO 9001:2000 for certified organizations”. Managerial Auditing Journal. 17 (5): 245. doi:10.1108/02686900210429669. hdl:10397/60545. ^ Quality Management Principles (PDF). International Organization for Standardization. 2015. ISBN 978-92-67-10650-2. ^ Beattie, Ken R. (1999). “Implementing ISO 9000: A study of its benefits among Australian organizations”. Total Quality Management. 10: 95–106. doi:10.1080/0954412998090. ^ “ISO 9000 – Quality management”. International Organization for Standardization. September 2021. ^ “ISO/TS 9002:2016 – Quality management systems – Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2015”. International Organization for Standardization. 2023. ^ “ISO 9004:2018 – Quality management – Quality of an organization – Guidance to achieve sustained success”. International Organization for

Management System Certification Bodies

  Download PDF UKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd. Management System Certification Bodies ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015- Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems for Quality Management Systems ISO9001, Environmental Management Systems ISO 14001, Occupational Health & SafetyManagement Systems ISO 45001, Medical Devices Quality Management SystemsRequirements for Regulatory Purposes ISO 13485, HACCP Based Food SafetyManagement Systems ISO 22000, Information Security Management Systems ISO27001 Information Technology Services Management System ISO 20000 SecurityManagement System for Supply Chain ISO 28000, Energy management System ISO50001, Ship Recycling Management System ISO 30000, Societal Security-BusinessContinuity Management Systems -Requirements ISO 22301, Asset Management-Management Systems- Requirements ISO 55001,GHG- Verifiers etc. · ISO/IEC 17021-1:Latest – Conformity Assessment – Requirements for BodiesProviding Audit and Certification of Management Systems.· ISO/TS 22003:Latest – Food Safety Management Systems – Requirements for BodiesProviding Audit and Certification of Food Safety Management Systems.· ISO/IEC 27006:Latest -Information Technology – Security Techniques Requirementsfor Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Information Security ManagementSystems.· ISO 28003:Latest – Security Management Systems for The Supply Chain –Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Supply Chain SecurityManagement Systems.· ISO 30003:Latest – Ships & marine Technology – Ship Recycling managementSystem-requirements for bodies providing audit & certification for ship recyclingmanagement.· ISO 14065:Latest Green House Gases -requirements for Green House Gasvalidation & verification bodies for using accreditation or other forms of recognition.· ISO 19011:Latest – Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems.· Relevant UKJAS Accreditation Requirements. Management System Certification Bodies Reference Books 1. Standards for Management Systems A Comprehensive Guide to Content, Implementation Tools, and Certification Schemes By Herfried Kohl · 2020     UK Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseC/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UKTel.: +448369083940email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   MUMBAI Head OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseB-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindaspada,Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)Tel.: +7499991895email: [email protected]: www.ukjas.com   DELHI-NCR Regd. OfficeUKJAS Accreditation Pvt. Ltd (UKJAS )UKJAS HouseAsaoti, Dist Palwal Faridabad Delhi NCR , HaryanaTel.: +91-7979801035Fax: +91-250 2341170 Website: www.ukjas.com Branches   Download PDF

Freelance consultant/ISO Auditor

IMS lead, auditor of ISO 9001, ISO 14001 ISO 18001, ISO 45001:2018, ISO 50001 Experience minimum 2 years working as Management Representative or certification body. ISO implementation , training, auditing of companies Qualification :  Diploma in Engg or BE/Elec/Eltc / Mech/ Person willing to travel

Retired IMS lead, auditor of ISO 17021 , ISO 17020, ISO 17024, ISO 17065

Retired IMS lead, auditor of ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 ISO 18001:2007, ISO 45001:2018, ISO 50001;2011 Experience minimum 2 years working as or certification body. ISO implementation, training, auditing Qualification:  Diploma in Engineering or Bachelor in Mechanical / Electrical / Electronic / Chemicals / Msc.. Person willing to travel Interested Candidate, Kindly send your latest CV, LA Certificates,Qualification Certificates,Audit log ect to fix appointment for interview

IMS lead, auditor of ISO 17021 , ISO 17020, ISO 17024, ISO 17065IMS lead, auditor

Experience minimum 2 years working as Management Representative or certification body. ISO implementation , training, auditing of companies Qualification :  Diploma in Engineering or Bachelor in Mechanical / Electrical / Electronic / Chemicals / Msc.. Person willing to travel on short notice For more information contact Mr. Mukesh Singh on Mobile 7979801035. www. indiamart.com/demingcertifications If interested kindly revert back with updated CV on [email protected] with following details: Name:Qualification:Total ISO Experience:Lead Auditor Experience:Current Location:Current Designation:Current Salary:Expected Salary:Notice Period:Interested Candidate, Kindly send your latest CV, LA Certificates,Qualification Certificates,Audit log ect to fix appointment for interview SIGNATURE web sites : www.indiamart.com/demingcertifications Elizabeth M. Executive Ph:+91-0250-2341257 [email protected] www.demingcert.com Deming Certification Services Pvt. Ltd.107 Mehta Chambers, Station Rd ,Vasai West, Mumbai 401203, India

Standards for Accreditation

Courtesy : neche.org The New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE) is one of seven regional higher education accrediting bodies in the United States.  NECHE is a voluntary, non-profit, self-governing organization having as its primary purpose the accreditation of educational institutions.  Through its evaluation activities the Commission provides public assurance about the educational quality of degree-granting institutions that seek or wish to maintain accreditation. Institutions of higher learning achieve accreditation from NECHE by demonstrating they meet the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation and comply with its policies.  The Standards for Accreditation establish criteria for institutional quality; in addition, the Commission adopts policies that elucidate the Standards, relate to their application, and otherwise ensure that the Commission is current with respect to federal requirements and changing circumstances in higher education and public expectation.  Moreover, the Commission expects affiliated institutions to work toward improving their quality, increasing their effectiveness, and continually striving toward excellence.  Its evaluative processes are designed to encourage such improvement. Each of the Standards articulates a dimension of institutional quality.  In applying the Standards, the Commission assesses and makes a determination about the effectiveness of the institution as a whole.  The institution that meets the Standards: has clearly defined purposes appropriate to an institution of higher learning; has assembled and organized those resources necessary to achieve its purposes; is achieving its purposes; has the ability to continue to achieve its purposes. The Commission recognizes that some aspects of an institution are always stronger than others.  Meeting the Standards does not guarantee the quality of individual programs, courses, or graduates, but serious weaknesses in a particular area may threaten the institution’s accreditation. The Commission approaches institutional differences in ways designed to protect both educational quality and individual philosophy and practice.  The Standards are aspirational expectations that must be met at least minimally.  They allow the Commission to appraise a wide variety of collegiate institutions, differing in purpose, size, organization, scope of program, clientele served, support, and control.  By design, the Standards as explicated welcome perceptive and imaginative innovation aimed at increasing the effectiveness of higher education. The institution whose policies, practices, or resources differ significantly from those described in the Standards for Accreditation must demonstrate that these are appropriate to higher education, consistent with the institution’s mission and purposes, and effective in meeting the intent of the Commission’s Standards.  The existence of collective bargaining agreements, in and of themselves, does not abrogate institutional, faculty, or staff obligations to comply with the Standards for Accreditation. Self-regulation is an essential element in the success of accreditation.  Thus, the Standards for Accreditation were developed through a lengthy participatory process involving the membership in articulating the dimensions of quality required of institutions of higher education deserving of the public trust.  Indeed the public as well was invited to participate in this process in recognition of the importance of higher education to the individual and collective well-being of our citizenry and for our economy.  Thus, the Standards represent the accrued wisdom of over 200 colleges and universities and interested others about the essential elements of institutional quality, and they offer a perspective that stresses the public purposes of higher education.  The Commission continually evaluates the effectiveness of its Standards and its processes for applying them and makes such changes as conditions warrant. Self-regulation obliges institutions to adhere to the Standards as a condition of their accredited status; accredited colleges and universities demonstrate their integrity through their continued voluntary compliance to these criteria.  Adherence to the Standards is periodically reviewed through peer evaluations that are preceded by self-studies directed toward demonstrating that the institution meets the Standards and that it has effective means to ensure institutional improvement.  This system of accreditation is based on institutions agreeing to participate in and to accept and profit by an honest and forthright assessment of institutional strengths and weaknesses. Each of the dimensions of institutional quality has a Statement of the Standard set forth in bold type.  The considerations in determining the fulfillment of the Standard are articulated in numbered paragraphs below the Statement of the Standard; these considerations provide a basis for institutions to undertake self-study as well as a basis for institutional evaluation by visiting teams and the Commission.  Because the Standards represent dimensions of institutional quality, they are necessarily interrelated.  Thus, considerations found in one Standard may also have application for another; for example, while there is a Standard on Integrity, Transparency, and Public Disclosure, considerations related to integrity may also be found in several of the other Standards. January 1, 2021 STANDARD ONE:  MISSION AND PURPOSES The institution’s mission and purposes are appropriate to higher education, consistent with its charter or other operating authority, and implemented in a manner that complies with the Standards of the New England Commission of Higher Education.  The institution’s mission gives direction to its activities and provides a basis for the assessment and enhancement of the institution’s effectiveness. 1.1 The mission of the institution defines its distinctive character, addresses the needs of society, identifies the students the institution seeks to serve, and reflects both the institution’s traditions and its vision for the future.  The institution’s mission provides the basis upon which the institution identifies its priorities, plans its future, and evaluates its endeavors; it provides a basis for the evaluation of the institution against the Commission’s Standards. 1.2 The institution’s mission statement is formally adopted by the governing board and appears in appropriate printed and digital institutional publications. 1.3 The institution’s purposes are concrete and realistic and further define its educational and other dimensions, including scholarship, research, and public service. Consistent with its mission, the institution endeavors to enhance the communities it serves. 1.4 The mission and purposes of the institution are accepted and widely understood by its governing board, administration, faculty, staff, students, and sponsoring entity (if any). They provide direction to the curricula and other activities and form the basis on which expectations for student learning are developed. Specific objectives, reflective of the institution’s overall mission and purposes, are developed by the institution’s individual units. 1.5 The institution periodically evaluates

About

About Ukjas Accreditation Pvt Ltd ISO/IEC 15189 Accreditation for Medical and Clinical laboratory accreditation for Quality and Safety of test performed. ISO/IEC 17020 Accreditation for Third party inspection (TPI) Body performing various types of inspection like material inspection, shipment inspection, goods inspection, NDT, Radiology etc. ISO/IEC 17021 Accreditation for Third party Auditing (TPA) Certification Body issuing certificate of ISO 9001/14001/18001/20001/22001/27001/28001/29001/31001/39001/45001/50001/55001/3834/AS9011/6081/TL9000/SQF/5S/TQM/Six sigma certification etc ISO/IEC 17024 Accreditation for Independent Training institute accreditation of their couses offered ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation for Calibration and Testing laboratories operating for various disciplined like metal testing , electrotechnical equipment calibration, mechanical calibration etc. Certification is a fantastic business asset but there is sometimes a misunderstanding about certification that governments deem it to be mandatory and, secondly, that all certification bodies have to be accredited by a National Accreditation Body which is the only accreditation body permitted to operate. This is simply not true. The UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills’ (BIS) official policy principles on Conformity Assessment and Accreditation in the UK clearly states“Accreditation is applicable to both the regulated and non-regulated sectors but should remain voluntary unless required by specific legislation.” In 2008, UKJAS Accreditation, an independent accreditation Body was formed to accredit a range of non-governmental certifying bodies that assess products, personnel, and management systems. About Us The UK Joint Accreditation Service (UKJAS) is an independent accreditation body for worldwide. UKJAS is recognized by government, Multi-national, Private Individual and Organizations to assess against internationally agreed standards, organizations that provide certification, testing, inspection and calibration services, rating agency, industrial association and training institutes etc . UKJAS operates as a non-profit-distributing private company, limited by guarantee. UKJAS is funded wholly from the services it provides. It receives no grants, donations or government funding that might undermine its independence. Fees from assessment and accreditation services make up more than 90% of its income with the remainder coming from training and other projects related to our mission. UKJAS promotes and lobbies for greater adoption of Accreditation and is recognized as a standard setter by the Industries and known for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. An introductory guide to UKJAS can be viewed at www.ukjas.com.

About Us

About Us Ukjas Accreditation Pvt Ltd ISO/IEC 15189 Accreditation for Medical and Clinical laboratory accreditation for Quality and Safety of test performed. ISO/IEC 17020 Accreditation for Third party inspection (TPI) Body performing various types of inspection like material inspection, shipment inspection, goods inspection, NDT, Radiology etc. ISO/IEC 17021 Accreditation for Third party Auditing (TPA) Certification Body issuing certificate of ISO 9001/14001/18001/20001/22001/27001/28001/29001/31001/39001/45001/50001/55001/3834/AS9011/6081/TL9000/SQF/5S/TQM/Six sigma certification etc ISO/IEC 17024 Accreditation for Independent Training institute accreditation of their couses offered ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation for Calibration and Testing laboratories operating for various disciplined like metal testing , electrotechnical equipment calibration, mechanical calibration etc. Certification is a fantastic business asset but there is sometimes a misunderstanding about certification that governments deem it to be mandatory and, secondly, that all certification bodies have to be accredited by a National Accreditation Body which is the only accreditation body permitted to operate. This is simply not true. The UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills’ (BIS) official policy principles on Conformity Assessment and Accreditation in the UK clearly states“Accreditation is applicable to both the regulated and non-regulated sectors but should remain voluntary unless required by specific legislation.” In 2008, UKJAS Accreditation, an independent accreditation Body was formed to accredit a range of non-governmental certifying bodies that assess products, personnel, and management systems. Why Us? It’s all about reassurance Knowing that your Certifying Body is being constantly monitored. Having recourse to a higher level of authority if needed. Knowing that the Certifying Body operates to defined procedures that are continually reviewed. Knowing that you have a balanced level of service that does not compromise your business operations. Knowing that you have someone to turn to if you have a problem with the quality of supplies or products. Knowing that this accreditation is independent of government. Knowing there is consistency of approach; no moving goal posts. Knowing there has been over 20 years of customer focus. Accreditation is a demonstration of competence to perform certification against a certain standard and is part of an international mechanism for building trust between suppliers and buyers. Certification bodies may be legally required to be accredited, be required by buyers of certified products or it may be just a way of demonstrating competence to their client. UKJAS accredited certification, testing and calibration and inspection reduces the need for suppliers to be assessed by each of their customers and accredited once , accepted worldwide. UKJAS involvement in international register of product person & organization(refer www.irppo.com) provides for mutual recognition and easy assess for recruiter, supplier and customer access. This reduces the need for multiple assessments of suppliers and as a consequence helps to reduce barriers to trade. Accreditation, with its many potential benefits for the quality of goods and in the provision of services throughout the supply chain, underpins practical applications of an increasingly wide range of activities across all sectors of the economy, from fishing to forestry, construction to communications, hardware to software, one country to others. What is the difference between the terms ‘accreditation’ and ‘certification’? There is sometime confusion between ‘certification’ and ‘accreditation’. The main difference is the level in the hierarchy of the conformity system. Put simply, certification is performed by certification bodies and involves a review of information and an on-site inspection or audit of the production facility. Accreditation functions at the ‘higher’ level and is verification by UKJAS or any other accreditation body. Accreditation: Accreditation is the formal recognition by an ‘accreditation authority’ to the technical and organisational competence of a conformity assessment body, to carry out a ‘specific service’ in accordance to the standards and technical regulations, as described in their ‘scope of accreditation’. It provides a means to identify a proven, competent evaluator so that the selection of a laboratory, inspection or certification body is an informed choice. Certification: Certification is the procedure by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process, system or person conforms to specified requirements. UKJAS Accreditation Pvt.Ltd is, in fact, one of the leading international accreditation bodies in the world, respected for its integrity, practicality, and impartiality. We belong to the World Accreditation Forum (WAF), an international association for accreditation, which promotes best practices in quality assurance worldwide and we pride ourselves on being technically outstanding without being overly formal or stuffy, Like an experienced mentor, as opposed to a judgemental overseer, we’re here to ensure you navigate a thorough, but the swift path through to compliance.  UKJAS Accreditation has accredited over 10 certification bodies, registered over 1500 assessors, auditors and quality related personnel achievements; and certificated over 1200 organizations. All certificated bodies, organizations and products are placed on the International Register (iregister.com) that has a live search function, providing the user with instant verification of the authenticity of any UKJAS Accreditation– and other accredited certificate holder. What is UKJAS?  The UK Joint Accreditation Service (UKJAS) is an independent accreditation body for worldwide. UKJAS is recognized by government, Multi-national, Private Individual and Organizations to assess against internationally agreed standards, organizations that provide certification, testing, inspection and calibration services, rating agency, industrial association and training institutes etc . UKAS operates as a non-profit-distributing private company, limited by guarantee. UKJAS is funded wholly from the services it provides. It receives no grants, donations or government funding that might undermine its independence. Fees from assessment and accreditation services make up more than 90% of its income with the remainder coming from training and other projects related to our mission. UKJAS promotes and lobbies for greater adoption of Accreditation and is recognized as a standard setter by the Industries and known for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. An introductory guide to UKAS can be viewed at www.ukjas.com. Does UKJAS have a regulatory role?  UKJAS is not a regulator. It does not have any legal or regulatory enforcement powers. UKJAS does however have an ‘oversight’ function and works to ensure that those organisations’ it accredits meet the applicable international accreditation standards, independent and Impartial Assessment. Does UKJAS accreditation guarantee the performance of a conformity assessment body?  Holding UKJAS accreditation does not in any way change the contractual responsibilities between an accredited conformity assessment

Translate »
×